Display:
Being unready for the responsibility, wanting to avoid single parenthood (which often means social exclusion and community banishment), Being too young (ditto), cannot afford baby now (which in the US health care systems, endangers health of both of the parents, and of the child), or being a afraid of baby changing life, are decisions that can be, and usually are, made with a lot of thought and agonising.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Thu Aug 23rd, 2007 at 07:01:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
 . . .  and then let's dispose of the inconvenient little thing that's in the way. Sorry, I don't buy that - particularly when it conflicts with all the heart felt feelings for convicted killers and the death penalty.
by BJ Lange (langebj@gmail.com) on Thu Aug 23rd, 2007 at 08:12:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Did you read my comment? You were complaining that the decision to interrupt pregnancy was supposedly done without proper consideration, and trying to support it by printing the reasons given for abortions. Reasons which are compatible with well thought out decisions, despite what you say.

You answer with a non sequitur general comment about how abortions should not exist. Are you interested in talking, or just repeating the same point over and over ?

All parts of the human life cycle can't be sacred. After all, sperms and ovules are as much "human life" as embryos. And indeed, in the 19th century masturbation, homosexuality and contraception were considered as waste of human life, and forbidden.

All this has nothing to do with the destruction of an adult, sentient member of society.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères

by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Thu Aug 23rd, 2007 at 08:49:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series