Display:
 . . .  and then let's dispose of the inconvenient little thing that's in the way. Sorry, I don't buy that - particularly when it conflicts with all the heart felt feelings for convicted killers and the death penalty.
by BJ Lange (langebj@gmail.com) on Thu Aug 23rd, 2007 at 08:12:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Did you read my comment? You were complaining that the decision to interrupt pregnancy was supposedly done without proper consideration, and trying to support it by printing the reasons given for abortions. Reasons which are compatible with well thought out decisions, despite what you say.

You answer with a non sequitur general comment about how abortions should not exist. Are you interested in talking, or just repeating the same point over and over ?

All parts of the human life cycle can't be sacred. After all, sperms and ovules are as much "human life" as embryos. And indeed, in the 19th century masturbation, homosexuality and contraception were considered as waste of human life, and forbidden.

All this has nothing to do with the destruction of an adult, sentient member of society.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères

by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Thu Aug 23rd, 2007 at 08:49:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series