Display:
You're almost on target to have 100 diaries before $100 oil.   If we can get Bush out of office before he hits Iran, there's a good chance we don't see $100 until after 2010.  We're overdue for a recession.

I still think you are right overall though.  Just a little early.

by HiD on Wed Sep 12th, 2007 at 07:30:55 PM EST
... China and India, it will as likely see a slowing of growth in demand as a drop in demand ... which means, still hanging around about where we are now ... and and with no buffer production available to act as a price anchor, we only need a single exogenous shock to get from where we are now to $100.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Thu Sep 13th, 2007 at 07:44:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
a US recession is a disaster for China.  If we slow down buying their crap, their economy will puke.

A move to $100 is just 25% now.  I agree, any big political event can make that move happen in a heartbeat.  

by HiD on Thu Sep 13th, 2007 at 10:30:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
... as all that. It may be the most important single national market, but its certainly not a majority of Chinese exports, and exports are not the sole growth driver in the current boom.

So it depends largely on whether its a synchronized slowdown with Europe and Japan. The Chinese economy will certainly continue growing if its merely the US in recession ... its post-Olympics where I would be more worried about a slowdown in the Chinese boom.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Fri Sep 14th, 2007 at 08:07:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Depends on how you define National.

If memory serves, the EU is a more important trading partner now to China than the US is mine de rien...

Fai de bèn a Bertrand, te lou rendra en cagant

by redstar on Fri Sep 14th, 2007 at 11:32:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... as an aside, not, that's not how I define national, hence the qualifier ... but when asking when the EU becomes a federal nation state is like asking how long a short piece of string can be ... given evolution in that direction, its a status that is most likely to recognized in the rear view mirror, and then some more or less arbitrary event will be selected as the "starting point".

... but, yes, that reinforces the point. North America is not even the largest single market for Chinese manufacturers, and export is not China's sole growth engine at this point in time.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Fri Sep 14th, 2007 at 03:18:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
If the American consumer cuts back sharply China will have an ugly recession.  And they have a lot of structural problems that a rapid growth rate is papering over.

My gut is we'll get to see who's right pretty soon.

by HiD on Fri Sep 14th, 2007 at 05:26:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
They certainly do have a lot of structural problems ... of course, so did the US when it overtook the English economy as the largest economy in the world.

There will be some broken glass, but they can weather an unsynchronized recession in the US.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Fri Sep 14th, 2007 at 07:25:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series