Display:
I think there is more to this than the mere existence of well-paid peak oil and climate change deniers. Obviously, a lot of their funding is coming out of the USA, but it doesn't make sense when their bilge is now so obviously bogus beyond contention.

If everybody accepts that peak oil is happening, if not now then within 15 years, isn't planning for it at least a little foresighted ? Certainly not worth deriding.

As for global warming, most oil companies have moved beyond frantically trying to deny the evidence and are moving into exploiting opportunities.

So why are they sneering ? Or rather, who's paying them to sneer ? And at whom specifically ?  Somebody amongst the "silk-suited" carbo-hypocrites represents a business threat to one of their clients. So they're going for smearing-by-association

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun Sep 16th, 2007 at 11:31:40 AM EST
Someone has to fund Mises. It certainly isn't going to be paying its own way. ;)

But I think it's more that these are adolescents being told to clean their rooms and saying 'NOT GONNA!'

There may not be much more going on that.

Does anyone read the Mises blog?

Cato, maybe, but Mises looks like the economic equivalent of Freeperville.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Sun Sep 16th, 2007 at 11:52:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
As for global warming, most oil companies have moved beyond frantically trying to deny the evidence and are moving into exploiting opportunities.
I mean... haven't the goons at the von Mises Institute seen the ads? BP: Beyond Petroleum with a sunflower as logo?

Oye, vatos, dees English sink todos mi ships, chinga sus madres, so escuche: el fleet es ahora refloated, OK? — The War Nerd
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Sep 23rd, 2007 at 05:26:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series