Display:
The only way it could make sense is if he was talking of the first gulf war (iran-iraq, 1980-88) when Saddam's push into Iran territory effectively gave him direct access to more coast line. He was still pretty far off the straits, and to think he would then turn against his western supporters and block it is far-fetched.

Remaking history, what could have happened if he did cut Iran artillery from the straits coastline, is that the US would have engaged Iran openly, the moment an Arab proxy would have deprived the mollahs of their only "weapon of mass destruction" (a blocus). But we are entirely in a work of fiction here.

May be the whole timeline gets fuzzy in his heads, see it's over three decades and he's past 80 now...

Pierre

by Pierre on Mon Sep 17th, 2007 at 12:03:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
If Saddam had ever managed to get control of the Straits of Hormuz or any other strategic oil interest and tried using them against us, he wouldn't have held them long. The entire damn US Navy and Marine Corps would have sent him packing all the way back to Shatt-al-Arab.

Hey, that happened once. Remember Desert Storm?

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Mon Sep 17th, 2007 at 07:38:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series