Display:

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2007/09/john-kerry-is-a.html#comments

What gets me is the crowd doing nothing (or did they cheer at the beginning/) and wondering what I'd've done--maybe it's that the crowd wasn't united, or that the fear of being arrested--HST said he'd been arrested once and never wanted to be arrested again.

But...it's out on the web, one two three different videos  and rememberinggiap over at Moon of Alabama...

...the sound of the taser...group solidarity--if they're gonna arrest ya, make sure you have support.

I'd appreciate comments from the ET crowd who lived through something...not similar...but the heightened tensions...I mean the sixties.  I mean...I get my news from the web and this whole "We're going to war with Iran" nonsense...is taken seriously it seems by mainstream news organisations, or at least given a voice with the neutrality of the reporters...ach...

when a culture descends into what it can live with - that is, that it is not happening to them directly - then it has descended to barbarism

malooga often points out to the 'lord of the flies' character of the empire - & in incidents such as this we are watching it - in situ

how many 'incidents' in iraq - & i would say the overwhelming number of 'incidents' where people are murdered - in their cars, at barriers etc etc are as much an expression of the cultural aberration that lies at the heart of the empire as much as it is an expression of overwhelming force

even the notion of overwhelming force has at is heart - stupidy, short term thinking, it is the expression of bullies

that is why it was charming & i use the word advisedly when hugo chavez 'played' the bully against the real bullies in his united nations speech. there was great seriousness but there was always an extremely human reproach against the empire that had very liitle to do with ideology but had a great deal to do with humanity

& there seems to precious little of that inside the belly of the beast - tho we know that the great majority of americans are oppossed to this illegal & immoral war, the great majority understand the brutal lies that hold up this shiftless administration but they do nothing, as this audience does nothing

not one hand held out - just the baton & the taser

rememberinggiap (link above)



Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.
by rg (leopold dot lepster at google mail dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 06:06:32 PM EST
Off topic: I don't think I'll be staying with you tomorrow, but we could get together Thursday afternoon if you're free, as the conference wraps up by 1pm.

Oye, vatos, dees English sink todos mi ships, chinga sus madres, so escuche: el fleet es ahora refloated, OK? — The War Nerd
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 06:09:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And in a comment from Tantalus (again, from the link above)

They're used to this in Florida. Apparently they have used stun guns on a child as young as six. There is no possible excuse for this. There is no possible way that a society that condones this can call itself civilized.

Apparently tasers can break your back. There's been a lot of talk about breaking the back of resistance lately, and that, it appears, is what they are doing to our children: manufacturing a spineless society. I am shaking with anger.

So there's also a class element.  The poor, the marginalised know about this, they live this, but now it's touching the middle classes.  Ask too many questions, get too loud, once the police man (or woman) decides enough's enough...ach

Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.

by rg (leopold dot lepster at google mail dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 06:10:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
manufacturing a spineless society

The best way to ensure that you reproduce is to follow the crowd and play by the rules. As such very, very few individuals throughout history have encouraged individualistic behavior, particularly for women (as risk taking by men can sometimes lead to big rewards). What % of people participated in the movements of the 60's? I think the number is smaller than most people imagine.

As the Vietnam draft showed, or the civil rights movement for that matter showed, people will not riot and risk arrest until the potential benefits outweigh the real costs.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 07:31:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
and the cops are now in trouble:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/18/student.tasered/index.html

This is a good example of the technologies that enable the surveillance state working in the opposite direction. I could see a lawsuit without the combo of a video camera and youtube, but this damning, direct evidence instantly forced the hand of the police to put these guys on leave, and the odds of this guy winning a lawsuit based on excessive force are pretty good.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 07:35:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
What does it matter? why should you put your trust into a judicial system when about to face extreme violence? (let us be clear, tazer are a step below guns) Your reasonning doesn't make sense. You don't win lawsuits for excessive violence against a system whose sole response is arrest, exclusion and tazing. Excessive violence implies a response that is above standards, above average. Yet, as you can see on the video, that was their only response, and it's likely that in all debates this is their only response.
This can't posibly be Kerry's first public debate: was he surprises to see cops intervene? is this by chance that the microphone is placed a step away from two police officers?

so? lawsuits? no, emigration.

Rien n'est gratuit en ce bas monde. Tout s'expie, le bien comme le mal, se paie tot ou tard. Le bien c'est beaucoup plus cher, forcement. Celine

by UnEstranAvecVueSurMer (holopherne ahem gmail) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 07:58:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Trust isn't involved here. The protester knew the risks to his person and came out ahead. This is a big black eye for the cops. A small piece of passive resistance that worked. Emigration? That is the coward's way out.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 08:43:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You write that the kid knew what kind of risk he was facing. This is extremely disturbing: you are telling me that tazing is a reasonable expectation. That tazing is a normal response to exceeding your time limit in a debate.

About emigration, a word that's often used in this sort of situation and that generates the most useless debate (i know i know, i used that word, so i'm just clarifying), it simply involves choosing to which government you give your money, and what actions you thus condone. You may think that political involvement can outweight this... I don't. But that's another discussion,  more complicated than being coward or not being one.

Rien n'est gratuit en ce bas monde. Tout s'expie, le bien comme le mal, se paie tot ou tard. Le bien c'est beaucoup plus cher, forcement. Celine

by UnEstranAvecVueSurMer (holopherne ahem gmail) on Wed Sep 19th, 2007 at 10:21:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Tazing is a known risk, yes. Police are by their institutional nature always interested in increasing their coercive power over the populace, which means this sort of activity has to be fought back constantly.

As far as emigration and choosing your government, I'd like to see more open borders but we're not going to have them anytime soon. Until the world is overall more equitable and the human population is under control we won't see it.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Wed Sep 19th, 2007 at 12:40:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think there is a distinction to be drawn between a desire to obtain more coercive power and the fact that the police already has that increasing power. There is also the problem of the police acting as a political moderator in a public debate. This isn't part of coercive power, but political power.

As a result there is no reason to see the police as a institutional agent aiming at reducing crime, checked by a judicial system, and in which lawsuits are a check, or in which lawsuit signal political resistance.

Rien n'est gratuit en ce bas monde. Tout s'expie, le bien comme le mal, se paie tot ou tard. Le bien c'est beaucoup plus cher, forcement. Celine

by UnEstranAvecVueSurMer (holopherne ahem gmail) on Wed Sep 19th, 2007 at 01:03:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
rg, this is so fucking outrageously sick!

No one in the audience protested! Some even seemed to be amused!

According to MSNBC's report, Kerry simply went back to the question and answer session while this man was being violated! ... For having been called upon by Kerry himself and having asked a controversial question.

Words fail me.
.

by Loefing on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 08:02:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
In fact, I think HST said he'd been to jail once, and that was for a crime he didn't commit.

The whole scene: It's like a cross between Idiocracy and Brazil.  American ET-ers: the sense I got is just...here's anna missed (from Moon of Alabama, link above)

Looks like the Milgram experiment in real life. The conformity and complicity of the audience is appalling, especially considering its a "liberal" one. Such displays of state violence have become expected to the extent that the audience is amused (and even cheering) as things begin to unfold, as if its a reality show - but then when the real violence comes on they laps into a catatonic stupor of inaction - like they are watching Rodney King at home on television. They don't call us sheeple for nothing.


Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.
by rg (leopold dot lepster at google mail dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 06:18:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It's shocking, I've had several friends who have been on the recieving end of riot sticks. One of whom got £20,000 after being assulted by the police.

I've always seen the police having to threaten people to keep them from joining in in situations like this, amongst a political  group, I've always seen half the police facing out and dealing with the crowd around, the fact that you dont have the police looking out so they are expecting not to be interfered with

That's what I find most scary

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.

by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 06:32:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My brain ties this to the "We're going to war with Iran" message.  The audience is watching, thinking, making judgements...but the only people acting are "those in control."

I thought about what I'd've done.  Maybe stand up and walk to the front, say to Mr. Kerry, "Excuse me, but they seem to be arresting that guy for asking questions."

I dunno.  Something.  But yeah, "scary" is the word.

I also thought "Solidarity".  The lack of, and the results of the lack of.

Turns out the guy is a journalist of some kind.  I'm hoping some civil rights lawyer types get onto this.  The video evidence is clear.  The female officer makes her move and he was supposed to walk out, sorta like bouncers escorting you from a club.  "Out on the street you go, sonny!"  But he says, "Are you arresting me?"

I was also reminded of Migeru's question:

"What will it take to radicalise the middle classes?"

(Well, it was along those lines)

I also thought of Kent State back in the sixties (apologies if I've mis-remembered), when they took over the offices, the police hauling people out, but...a taser?  The sound...  And the police following procedure, and feeling that they have obeyed the rules.

HST destroyed a guy's career for behaviour like that--a counter charge, suing for millions of dollars for wrongful arrest, get the police on the back foot...any US lawyers in the house?

And now it reminds me of one of Bernhard's comments a while back:

"The latest thing in Germany is to steal the air from the tires of SUVs and then leave a sticker on the windscreen explaining about environmental damage."

(My paraphrase.)

The point being, "to act or not to act": when they taser a guy for basically banging on too long, that's too late...ach...someone better at expressing themself can hopefully express it better.

Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.

by rg (leopold dot lepster at google mail dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 06:47:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Somthing makes me think that they need a course in basic political organisation and resistance.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 07:14:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Judgments against the police are not at all uncommon in the US. Remember how this is a "lawsuit society?" People are not afraid to sue the cops for harassment.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 07:20:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
it wasn't that, more the fact that people weren't in the polices faces there and then giving them grief about interfering with the kid trying to speak. and even more that the police were acting as if they didn't expect to be interfered with.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 07:24:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I know what you mean, but this wasn't a protest. An antagonistic crowd is far different than a bunch of people listening to a speech. The group psychology is completely different.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 07:39:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'd still expect at least one person to get up and tell the police they were out of order. At the very minimum it should have been Kerry.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 09:05:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yeah, Kerry definitely should have, but I'm not surprised that he didn't.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 09:20:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"Give me your hungry, your tired, your poor
I'll piss on 'em
That's what the Statue of Bigotry says
Your poor huddled masses
Let's club 'em to death
And get it over with
And just dump 'em on the boulevard."

Lou Reed, Dirty Blvd.

"If you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles." Sun Tzu

by Turambar (sersguenda at hotmail com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 10:43:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series