I do not want to argue several cogent alternative engineering views of what happened at the Pentagon, 9/11. We are not allowed; as I understand the situation.
I maybe made my case too vociferously, such that it appeared conspiratorial. My point was that, talking about 911, there appear to be a number of engineerng anomalies that have yet to be officially explained. These anomalies have been proposed by professonal pilots of long experience, as well as believable senior military representatives. There is no doubt in my mind that an alternative exists, and that a failure to understand that view renders arguments one sided.
While I accept that the notion of a 911 (neocon) conspiracy is probably bizarre, I nevertheless think that, as good detectives, we follow the evidence where it leads..
But if you have already made up your minds, then you are not a client that I'd like to work wiih You can't be me, I'm taken
We are not allowed; as I understand the situation.
And that 9/11 thread you refer to demonstrates why: the people that bring up the 9/11 conspiracy theories, and those that are willing to believe them will never be convinced by any argument, however well based on facts, evidence and physics. Thus it is an absolute waste of time to make the arguments. Like I said, DoDo, stormy and others provided massive amounts of evidence to debunk the various points raised by mmmm (with new ones coming up each time).
But you seem to think that no argument has been provided, and you use the thread as an example to whine about how the poor hoi polloi are oppressed, censored and not taken seriously on ET. Well, you're 100% wrong on this.
If that thread did not change your mind on 9/11, nothing will, and that's a real case of "if you have already made up your minds,..."
These anomalies have been proposed by professonal pilots of long experience, as well as believable senior military representatives.
Just FYI - this is again the argument by authority, not by facts.
There is no doubt in my mind that an alternative exists, and that a failure to understand that view renders arguments one sided.
"no doubt in my mind" - that supposedly open mind of yours? "an alternative exists" - all the version that have been proposed are, each time, a lot more absurd and bizarre than the version they purport to debunk.
you are not a client that I'd like to work wiih
Is that meant as an insult? In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
And that 9/11 thread you refer to demonstrates why
You just exposed yourself to more allegations of suppressing multiple views...
To make the argument to Sven a bit differently and hopefully in a way perceived less confrontatively: Had it been not allowed, I and later stormy wouldn't have made detailed counter-arguments. But in fact it seems that for you, it is the real or claimed expertise of the claim-maker that counts, and you are less inclined to consider the arguments itself, as I have done. It is true that you as a non-technical person, you are justified to bow out of judging the technical validity of the arguments itself. However,
A lot of people here have experience, professional or other expertise. You bring yours up often in support of your ideas as a kind of higher claim to consideration.
But, if you're now posing as a consultant to ET... Remember that no one called you to ask for a quote.
