European Tribune

Display:
Oops.  Sorry, I missed Jerome's and Nordic Storm's diaries.  I would not have posted this article had I read them first.  Or at least would have done so under one of those two diaries, with more understanding.

However, Nordic Storm did write:

Given this very complex and seemingly unworkable situation, news media and talk on street are now openly speaking about the collapse of Belgium into two independent states within the EU or even alliance/incorporation of Wallonia into France and Flanders back into the Netherlands.

While I see how the FT article Jerome diaried could be construed as pushing an anti-EU/solidarity agenda, I see this current article as simply bringing this issue -- a real issue, not a pseudo-issue concocted out of thin air -- to the attention of New York Times readers.  I don't see it as part of some neoliberal conspiracy to break up the E.U. into quibbling nationalist and classist factions.

The article makes the points:

There would be overwhelming local and international resistance to turning Brussels into the capital of a country called Flanders.

The economies of the two regions are inextricably intertwined, and separation would be a fiscal nightmare.

That doesn't sound exactly like advocacy for the break-up of the country.

On the other hand, if the Vlaams Belang is as marginal and irrelevant as you imply it is, then it is a shame that the article did highlight them as it did.

Statistical thinking will one day be as necessary for efficient citizenship as the ability to read or write.

by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Sat Sep 22nd, 2007 at 04:18:00 AM EST
No, the Vlaams Belang is not marginal or irrelevant, but it is behind a prophilactic barrier for a reason. The NYT doesn't mention this, even to remind their readers that Europe doesn't have a First Amendment.

Oye, vatos, dees English sink todos mi ships, chinga sus madres, so escuche: el fleet es ahora refloated, OK? — The War Nerd
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Sep 22nd, 2007 at 04:25:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That doesn't sound exactly like advocacy for the break-up of the country.

How many people do you thinkk will make it past the headline, photos and the first 14 paraghraphs to

Certainly, there are reasons Belgium is likely to stay together, at least in the short term.
and the rest of it?

It's not advocacy. It's subliminal, maybe not even intentional. But just last Tuesday at one of the Lib Dem conference fringe events someone casually dropped "Belgium is breaking up" as if it were an established fact just because it was in the FT that morning.

Oye, vatos, dees English sink todos mi ships, chinga sus madres, so escuche: el fleet es ahora refloated, OK? — The War Nerd

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Sep 22nd, 2007 at 04:37:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's not advocacy. It's subliminal, maybe not even intentional.

Whatever it is, it's certainly got people's attention.

As of 4:51 AM in New York (2007/9/22), the article is number 1 on the New York Times most emailed list.

Statistical thinking will one day be as necessary for efficient citizenship as the ability to read or write.

by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Sat Sep 22nd, 2007 at 04:54:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
See? And that is the problem.

Oye, vatos, dees English sink todos mi ships, chinga sus madres, so escuche: el fleet es ahora refloated, OK? — The War Nerd
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Sep 22nd, 2007 at 05:00:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series