Display:
Placing aside the group promoting this, I think that there's a real discussion to be had about the need for common safety regulations and environmental and labor safeguards.  I think that this can be achieved mulilaterally, but I think that in the absence of an established framework that's accepted as legitimate, there's the danger that the end of American hegemony will result in horrors that make Iraq pale in comparision. There has to be order, or it's a war of all upon all.  Not because that's what people want, but because the small portion of the population that are total egoists force everyone to be guarded or suffer.

And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
by ManfromMiddletown (manfrommiddletown at lycos dot com) on Fri Sep 28th, 2007 at 04:43:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Placing aside the group promoting this, I think that there's a real discussion to be had about the need for common safety regulations and environmental and labor safeguards.

absolutely.  the guaranteed minimum, the standard of decency -- but it isn't decent if it isn't generalised.  "common environmental regs" within the EU or N Am don't do diddly if "the rest of the world" is made a sacrifice zone for industrial vandalism...  and this point is not "merely" moral, but pragmatic:  it's a small planet, and the destruction being wrought in "lesser nations" will, and does, impact health and happiness worldwide.  the world is one, the climate is one, the oceans are one.  the wind doesn't stop blowing at an arbitrary human property line.

the gated-community model is guaranteed to exacerbate, outside its boundary, whatever miseries or abuses its inhabitants seek to escape.  or so I believe, having watched the model in action.

The difference between theory and practise in practise ...

by DeAnander (de_at_daclarke_dot_org) on Fri Sep 28th, 2007 at 05:38:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series