I'm not read-up on the project in detail, but from what I know, it is a very ambitious one: it's not simply about bringing standard European cross-section freight to Britain, but going beyond, as US-style double-stack containers are beyond the largest European normal-gauge cross-section. I consider this part of the project less viable, not only due to significant infrastructure investment needs this side of the Chunnel, but compatibility, too -- e.g. containers travelling say from Warshaw would have to be re-loaded in Paris or Lille.
If they would just go for normal cross-section, and get a good agreement with SNCF for the passage of freight there, I think it would make sense.
I note that in terms of railways out of the local standard, the most striking example is a Russian broad-gauge freight line, which extends 400 km into Poland from the Ukrainian border, with a planned extension (which is unlikely until Poland is ruled by nationalists) reaching the edge of the Czech Republic. (Check this map, it's a narrow red-dotted green line.)
Another negative point from my point of view is going for diesel traction, but financially, it is unfortunately a good choice. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
Even considering peak oil? Oye, vatos, dees English sink todos mi ships, chinga sus madres, so escuche: el fleet es ahora refloated, OK? — The War Nerd
I'd hope $300 oil would change the picture radically even if interoperability would not be brought further by then. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.