Display:
I wasn't suggesting that we stamp down on the human face of non-geekery with our macho technocratic bandwidth demands so much as just plain asking if there's hard information about how many people are using dial-up, and whether or not they were finding the thread too much.

My guess is that most people aren't, and didn't, but I'm more than willing to be proved wrong about that.

But I'll be surprised if it's a serious problem, because all we're doing is copying what sites like Flickr and Picasa and Photobucket do already - and they don't seem to have acquired a reputation for exclusivity.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Fri Sep 7th, 2007 at 08:01:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I wasn't thinking of you, TBG.

If the thread loaded well for lower bandwidths, I expect it's because most people did in fact reduce the size of their JPEG files. There seemed to be a consensus about it - then some comments suggested it might not be worth bothering about, and the polloi could just use a collapsed thread. Which is what I reacted to.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Sep 7th, 2007 at 08:13:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Sorry - forgot to say that hard information is probably not easy to get. A poll would only involve a small number of those who come by ET. (Not that I'm speaking against a poll: anyone is free to put up a diary and append a poll.)
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Sep 7th, 2007 at 08:17:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I agree with that. I considered doing a poll within this diary but all I could think of was "do you find graphics heavy threads difficult to download, yes or no?"!  

So I figured people can discuss in the comments whether they have any problems with graphics and that  will give a better gauge.

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Fri Sep 7th, 2007 at 09:00:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series