It's probably not such a good idea to post photos in comments replying to other comments, otherwise we'll risk doing horrible things to people's browser windows. Ad astra per aspera
All could be posted as top-level comments - chronological display would retain the timeline. You can't be me, I'm taken
I don't think we've actually discussed how big the photo in the diary itself should be.
that is exactly my point. LEP's picture on Wednesday was very pretty, but it was the one that burst the frame for me. so if we are talking about limitations in comments we should also mention limitations in the main body.
But the limits are different, as there is more space in a comment (I think) - it is about this I think, what are the space limitations? for a comment it is 400-500, or?. Is that to much for the diary main body?
I guess we should apply the same idea to the diary then but perhaps allow for a little more ie 800 pixels width and no more than 150kb size?
Or for simplicity stick with 600 pixels width and 100kb max file size, throughout?
(not sure how big LEP's first picture was) Ad astra per aspera
Hey, Grandma Moses started late!
It's OK but not as impressive as the 800px, 329mb version. Hey, Grandma Moses started late!
(-:
(And the 640 does break the window on my screen on my work computer here.)
but only 22, thumbs up for that (-:
