We are not going to give advance instructions here to any user or lurker that they must set Dynamic Minimal in order to access this or that diary.
This sounded preemptory... You can't be me, I'm taken
It should be obvious that we should not produce a dichotomy between technically-enabled users and others in their access to different parts of ET.
Neither do I appreciate your dismissal of a 'photography club' somehow operating within ET. There aren't Energy Clubs, Politics Clubs or Astrology Clubs. Visuals are part of today's discourse and there are a few people here (and I believe you are one of them) who think that visuals, (eg charts) can do things that text can't. Photographs, whether personal or from elsewhere, can also make text come alive. Some people are interested in improving their skills in this direction for the benefit of ET as well as their own communications expertise.
And last but not least, photos have a social role to play in this community. You can't be me, I'm taken
I didn't "dismiss" a photography club "somehow operating" in ET. I said we shouldn't create a separate club, particularly with different access conditions. I was simply warning against something I don't think would be a good development.
Obviously I agree on visuals, always have, and I think you know that.
Why are you attempting to paint me as a censor or a prohibitor? As someone who is intent on doing down photographers, who can't see that it's for the benefit of ET or can play a social role? When did I say anything to the contrary? As they say on the blogs, talk about a strawman...
A gnome giving an opinion in a thread doesn't equate to a new rule being laid down. Ad astra per aspera
Hey, Grandma Moses started late!
De toute façon, qui veut m'épeler "cimetiére"?
:-) Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner - that I moved to Nice.
