The sharpening suggestion was because of LEP's original resized version, which was very obviously softer and less detailed than the original.
And I wouldn't want to shoot around possible compression limitation. I'd rather take my chances and use less compression than miss a photo.
I'd agree that if a resized photo looks fine, then sharpening is very optional. It's more of an 'Okay - looks like lost something essential there...' option.
The most complicated picture I can imagine--leaves, bark, siding, grass, fading light, 63k
The point I was trying to make is that 100 k is VERY generous. "Remember the I35W bridge--who needs terrorists when there are Republicans"
What pickel-sniffing low life troglodyte would live in a dump like that?
;0
This is the boyhood home of Thorstein Veblen--it was built by his father using the hand tools he could haul to the middle of a continent in a wagon.
It is now owned by a charming couple. He is a retired oil refinery manager who has dark visions for the future because he acually understands the sheer volume of oil we consume every day. She is a good earth mother who can weave and grows a huge garden. They are not Veblen scholars but they live in significant ways and share similar philosophies as the Veblen family in the late 19th century. "Remember the I35W bridge--who needs terrorists when there are Republicans"
I was just jerking your chain.
