Display:
Chancellor Merkel Wants German Troops to Stay in Afghanistan  |  Deutsche Welle

Amid criticism from opposition parties, German Chancellor Angela Merkel appealed to Germans in her weekly video podcast on Saturday, Sept. 15, to support German troops deployed in war-torn Afghanistan.

"There is no alternative," Merkel said, amid continuing criticism from opposition parties, which have called for a partial or complete pullout of Germany's biggest force abroad from the conflict.

She said the issue was not just the welfare of the Afghan people but Germany's own security as well.

Foreign troop deployments require regular votes of approval from the German parliament. The mandates for the peacekeepers and forces backing the war against the Taliban come up for renewal in October and November.

"We must not leave Afghanistan to the terrorists again," said Merkel.

Instead, the German chancellor said, Afghanistan had to be helped to establish robust government institutions.

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Sun Sep 16th, 2007 at 12:16:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
So, following Merkel's Bushesque logic, should I expect German soldiers in the Iraqi theatre of the "GWOT" anytime soon? Coalition of the...errr...willing betwetters and all.

Good to see the Warsaw Pact mentality is alive and well in a country other than Poland. Nice of the Germans to have picked an Ossi, though too bad they didn't pick one from our camp...

Fai de bèn a Bertrand, te lou rendra en cagant

by redstar on Sun Sep 16th, 2007 at 12:53:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Merkel is chancellor today because in 2002 her party rival Edmund Stoiber refused to rule out a role in Iraq - giving Gerhard Schröder the election. She's definitely not going there.

The domestic context is that the current Afghanistan mission (in a supporting role) is up for legislative renewal, and something like 2/3 of the electorate is agin it.

The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman

by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Sun Sep 16th, 2007 at 06:33:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
O I know, only tickling the subject a bit.

But the rhetoric is quite "global war on terror," especially the intervention in a state to fight non-state actors who may or may not be there.

Fai de bèn a Bertrand, te lou rendra en cagant

by redstar on Sun Sep 16th, 2007 at 09:36:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Conventiently for the Grand Coalition, this debate is now also tearing apart the Greens. At the presently held party conference, the Realo-wing-dominated leadership brought in a motion for continued support of the Afghan mission, against loud protests. The base voted it down, and voted in an alternative motion for ending the mission instead.                                                                                            

I fear neither side truly comprehends the situation. The Realos, just like interventionist liberals elsewhere, see noble goals and ignore the issue of whether they are achievable with the means at disposal, and ther allies at hand. And I'm not sure that many on the opposed side really contemplate how much in a dire straits the country is, and will be even without Western meddling. (So in effect I think the base is naive yet demands the right move.)

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Sun Sep 16th, 2007 at 06:29:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
There are Greens supporting the war?

That's inexplicable and surreal.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Sun Sep 16th, 2007 at 09:38:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This is the legacy of Joschka Fischer: the doctrine that you cannot be a "respectable" (i.e. "eligible for ministries in a coalition govt.) political party without buying into the Atlantic foreign policy consensus.

The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Sun Sep 16th, 2007 at 10:23:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Plus, the No more war No more Holocaust doctrine, which they seem to believe earnestly (though it started as a propaganda line during the Kosovo war).

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sun Sep 16th, 2007 at 11:08:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series