Oh no please don't call me like that. You'll be really disappointed at my credentials. I was trying to word my findings carefully to avoid this, but let me put here a full disclaimer:
That being said...
> Is the Diebold affect still showing about 4.6% on Clinton's tally?
Slightly less. With a coefficient of 3.18 percentage points, Diebold is still the non-political variable having the highest coefficient in the model.
