Display:
lychee:
There is also the distant possibility that it could be someone trying to show how optical scan can be manipulated, although this was a really bad time to do it.

This is the only one of these options that makes sense. Every time you do something like this you provide more data to prove that something has happened, and once this is proved then the whole scheme goes out of the window, (Plus it ends up with past results being looked at more closely). If this is happening surely this is the last thing you'd want to happen.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.

by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Sun Jan 13th, 2008 at 06:53:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If this is happening surely this is the last thing you'd want to happen.

Huh? I'm not quite sure how to interpret that. :)

In terms of what makes sense, reasons for fraud don't necessarily have to be logical. It's quite possible (again, if it's fraud) that someone did this just to mess with the Dems.

You know, as I think more and more about it, I keep coming back to how glaring this is-- really, if someone's going to commit fraud, they'd want to hide it well, not have numbers that make others stop and stare, unless they want people to stop and stare. This may be one of those "agree to disagree" things. :)

by lychee on Sun Jan 13th, 2008 at 07:29:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
They may just be relying on the only peole stopping and staring are maths and statistics geeks (no offence Mig ;-)) and then assuming that people with those geeky tendencys will not be able to communicate it effectively to the ordinary man in the street and get him to stop and stare.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Sun Jan 13th, 2008 at 07:43:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series