At 25/MWh you need 800 MWh to cover the 20k fixed costs. This is at most (assuming 2000 MWh/yr) 40% of the production. This leaves you with 60% of the production to sell to investors. Since the investors put in 1.5M, each 25k of investment buys them 1% of the output. How much is this worth?
1% of the output is between 20 and 30 MWh/yr, at 25 to 75 /MWh, for 20 to 25 years. That is between 10k and 56k total. Over 20 years, though, variations will average out to between 19k and 22k total. This always loses money compared with 25k, but that is because you have offloaded the entire risk to the investors.
If instead you say that over 20 years the average price is unlikely to drop below 40/Mwh so you need only 500 MWh/yr to cover fixed costs; and arguing the 20-year average output is unlikely to drop below 2.4 Gwh/yr, you only need 21% of the production to cover costs and you can sell on 79%. Then each 19k of investment buys 1%, and returns 19k to 22k total at 95% confidence, for about 1.5% return above inflation with no downside. We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
The extreme case is where you assume a 75/MWh wholesale price so you only need 267 MWh/yr to cover your fixed costs, and assume 3GWh/yr production, enabling you to sell 91% of the production so 1% of production (returning 19k to 22k) costs 17k. this is still 1.5% per year above inflation, tops.
How can you issue debt on this project at more than 4.5% yield? We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
Typically, a wind project will sell its electricity to a local utility for 3-4c/kWh (usually under a long term fixed price contract) and get an additional 2c/kWh (inflated) via the PTC for the first 10 years.
The higher (and very stable when you have a fixed pirece power purchase agreement) revenue levels make the project able to service debt even during periods of low wind. The cash waterfall is simple: revenu is used first to pay ongoing operating costs, then debt costs (which are fixed if you used a fixed interest rate), and whatever's left, which is likely to be quite volatile goes to the investor.
Depending on the project, the investor and the country, debt can cover 70 to 90% of the initial investment. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
What you're saying is that wind needs a wholesale price of $50 to $60 per MWh but that the wholesale price that can be locked in with long-term contracts is $30 to $40. We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
And the reason long term prices cannot be locked at higher levels is because it is difficult to force utilities to buy power at a higher price than they can get from coal-fired plants, especially older ones that have been grandfathered and do not have to fulfill all pollution and emission requirements and have to pay neither the environmental damage of strip mining, mountaintop removal or global warming.
So yes, I object to any expression that makes it look like wind gets huge subsidies. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes