Display:
I've never flown into JFK, fortunately, but all the stories I've heard confirm your take.

Hartsfield-Jackson's going to become more crowded as long as Atlanta's becoming more crowded, I'm afraid, and -- assuming they don't run out of water (which, granted, seems to be an increasingly stupid assumption) -- that's not going to stop anytime soon.  Atlanta's fortunate to have a lot of unused land (its greatest asset and greatest roadblock to serious urban planning) around that section of town, so the option to continue expanding the airport is at least there, unlike in New York.

I'm not sure how much say the suburbs have on Metro, though.  Don't the Virginia DOT and the WMATA decide that?  I agree on the whole that the line to Dulles would be a plus, but the city is leaving itself wide open to the energy crisis by not building lines into the suburbs.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin

by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Thu Jan 24th, 2008 at 06:09:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Dulles rail project is managed by the Washington airport authority (but paid for by the State and Feds), but there is controversy.  The sad story of the "secret" contract ("The state has refused to make details of the contract publicly available.") is covered by Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_Line_(Washington_Metro)

but it appears (and I recall) local government participation.

I can swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell. _ Blood Sweat & Tears

by Gringo (stargazing camel at aoldotcom) on Thu Jan 24th, 2008 at 03:17:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series