Display:
FT.com: The worst market crisis in 60 years by George Soros

Every time the credit expansion ran into trouble the financial authorities intervened, injecting liquidity and finding other ways to stimulate the economy. That created a system of asymmetric incentives also known as moral hazard, which encouraged ever greater credit expansion. The system was so successful that people came to believe in what former US president Ronald Reagan called the magic of the marketplace and I call market fundamentalism. Fundamentalists believe that markets tend towards equilibrium and the common interest is best served by allowing participants to pursue their self-interest. It is an obvious misconception, because it was the intervention of the authorities that prevented financial markets from breaking down, not the markets themselves. Nevertheless, market fundamentalism emerged as the dominant ideology in the 1980s, when financial markets started to become globalised and the US started to run a current account deficit.

Globalisation allowed the US to suck up the savings of the rest of the world and consume more than it produced. The US current account deficit reached 6.2 per cent of gross national product in 2006. The financial markets encouraged consumers to borrow by introducing ever more sophisticated instruments and more generous terms. The authorities aided and abetted the process by intervening whenever the global financial system was at risk. Since 1980, regulations have been progressively relaxed until they have practically disappeared.

The super-boom got out of hand when the new products became so complicated that the authorities could no longer calculate the risks and started relying on the risk management methods of the banks themselves. Similarly, the rating agencies relied on the information provided by the originators of synthetic products. It was a shocking abdication of responsibility.



We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jan 23rd, 2008 at 01:08:48 PM EST
This is just the end of a housing boom during a Gilded Age.

Its not like the end of the 1920's or 1880's housing booms during a Gilded age were all that traumatic, was it?


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Thu Jan 24th, 2008 at 12:20:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Am I right in thinking the current crisis shares more features with the Panic of 1873 than with the Crash of 1929?

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jan 24th, 2008 at 02:10:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm thinking of parallels with the Great Panic that led to the Depression of the 1890's ...

... that is, a massive wave of capital flows from a massive trade surplus region (North Atlantic Europe, East Asia) to a massive trade deficit region (the Southern Cone, North America), with ever more dubious instruments to keep the ride going, until a major financial capital bubble in the trade deficit region bursts, revealing the financial mess that has been created over more than a decade and throwing a big monkey wrench in the engine of global purchasing power creation.

That, of course was the peak of the previous period of globalization, followed by a period of economic bloc formation.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Thu Jan 24th, 2008 at 09:47:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Followed by a World War.

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Feb 1st, 2008 at 05:13:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series