European Tribune

Display:
I thought the general wisdom was that it is bad for a party to get the race decided to early, as the media then focuses on the other race?
by A swedish kind of death on Thu Jan 31st, 2008 at 01:16:44 AM EST
Depends on the circumstances.  Again, in this case, it could go either way and depends wholly on how ugly things get between Obama and Clinton.  I think it's going to get pretty ugly, unfortunately.  The Clintons bombed him quite a bit up to this point, and today in Denver he went at both of them harder than I've seen before.

If it stays clean, it'll be good for the Dems, because it will keep McCain off the front page while churning interest in the Democrats.  But that's quite an if, and you need only have a look at the blogs and the stories that have dominated the news for the last few days to see why.  The NY State National Organization for Women press release -- the one alleging Ted Kennedy had betrayed women by endorsing Obama -- went pretty big tonight.  And Bill Clinton's Jesse Jackson comment -- really a non-story when placed next to Bill Shaheen's "coke dealer" comment -- has been pretty big, too.

So the potential for the gender/race issue to explode is certainly there, and you can bet the press will want that, because it'll sell a ton of advertising.  That said, it doesn't seem to be a big issue among actual primary voters outside of the blogs so far.

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Thu Jan 31st, 2008 at 01:29:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
"No publicity is bad publicity" is for movie stars, not politicians.

We could end up with a 1884 Republican scenario, when the mugwumps bolted.

Utsukushikereba sore de ii

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Thu Jan 31st, 2008 at 12:55:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recent Diaries
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series