Was he third in delegates for Iowa? I know he ran second among state convention delegates (the tally shown on television that night), but I wasn't aware of him coming in third on actual DNC delegates.
Some Edwards supporters do, indeed, have a need to blame something, and some are quite nasty, but I think they make a valid point on the media. The press coverage of this race has been complete shit. WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
I'd love to believe otherwise, but he was never really in the running.
There's no solid progressive narrative in the US, and no media space for progressive ideals. dKos isn't much better. The Dems would rather eat each other than agree on real change.
There seems to be an incredible blindness to practical issues. It's all about the most superficial take on superficial narratives, with people apparently supporting whoever makes them feel good about themselves.
There was only ever going to be one anti-Clinton vote. The press made sure of that by solidifying her status throughout 5/6s of 2007. There was a shot at changing that -- or at least I'd hoped there was -- after Iowa, but they're the Clintons. For all the talk of the press "hating them" (a total crock of shit given how reporters play into their narratives), the primaries were written as Hillary vs Someone Else long ago, as anyone who's watched the whole time knows.
Of course people vote for whomever makes them feel good. And Edwards is no exception there. And, yes, it fucking stupid. WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!