European Tribune

Display:
Well, to be fair, I'm not sure NC could've been made competitive even if Kerry had chosen Jesus as his running mate.  Edwards was still the obvious choice for his compelling story and speeches, and the fact that he lent Kerry some "ruralization" when Kerry was being painted as some kind of Yankee aristocrat.

Was he third in delegates for Iowa?  I know he ran second among state convention delegates (the tally shown on television that night), but I wasn't aware of him coming in third on actual DNC delegates.

Some Edwards supporters do, indeed, have a need to blame something, and some are quite nasty, but I think they make a valid point on the media.  The press coverage of this race has been complete shit.

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Thu Jan 31st, 2008 at 02:42:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Edwards was always the 'We're still a democracy because we have a real fire-breathing eat-the-rich stand-up but aw shucks what a shame he didn't win' candidate.

I'd love to believe otherwise, but he was never really in the running.

There's no solid progressive narrative in the US, and no media space for progressive ideals. dKos isn't much better. The Dems would rather eat each other than agree on real change.

There seems to be an incredible blindness to practical issues. It's all about the most superficial take on superficial narratives, with people apparently supporting whoever makes them feel good about themselves.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Jan 31st, 2008 at 04:40:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Dems have been eating each other for at least forty years, so that's nothing new.  Edwards was very much in the running prior to the post-Iowa blackout, and let's be honest: It was the cry and Bill Clinton's pre-NH meltdown that did the most to assist that.

There was only ever going to be one anti-Clinton vote.  The press made sure of that by solidifying her status throughout 5/6s of 2007.  There was a shot at changing that -- or at least I'd hoped there was -- after Iowa, but they're the Clintons.  For all the talk of the press "hating them" (a total crock of shit given how reporters play into their narratives), the primaries were written as Hillary vs Someone Else long ago, as anyone who's watched the whole time knows.

Of course people vote for whomever makes them feel good.  And Edwards is no exception there.  And, yes, it fucking stupid.

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Thu Jan 31st, 2008 at 05:00:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Agreed on all counts.
I've marveled for many years at the American lack of the ability to cooperate, to compromise, to adopt a strategy incorporating common social goals, on all sides of the social spectrum in the US. The Repubs don't really do much better- the rank and file Repub just surrendered his or her input, and took what was served up on the political/ideological plate--and their party has been largely destroyed as a consequence. And now that I've a good big dose of life and politics in Europe, it's the same-a bloody epidemic of squabbling over chicken bones, while the same old oligarchy eats the chicken.
I search for central causes- social processes, ideas that might be the major influences in producing such a gigantic body of tame people, and ironically, it often seems to come down to "competition" as embodied in the neoliberal/capitalist story.
A linear, two-dimensional mechanistic story that reifies "competition" as a way to improve things, and is widely believed, made Edwards' story of strength through cooperation, compassion, class consciousness  --- just incomprehensible.     He never had a chance.


"There is mysterious music in democracy, when people decide to believe in themselves." ---Bill Greider, The Nation.
by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Fri Feb 1st, 2008 at 03:58:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Edwards came out of Iowa with one less delegate than Clinton--and six less than Obama.  On the day he dropped out, Edwards was still quite competitive in the delegate numbers, all of which are still tiny compared to the number needed to nominate anyone.
by keikekaze on Thu Jan 31st, 2008 at 07:36:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series