The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
More troubling is the suggestion that Gazprom has ever cut gas deliveries to countries that were paying market prices and on time, and saying otherwise, however often, still does not make it true. Or are you suggesting that gas companies should generally not be allowed to cut deliveries to delinquent customers?
Hers's a quick exercise in Russian contracts. Go to toilet, take a healthy dump, then put your hands in and scoop out the deposit. Squish it around. You have a Russian contract on your hands.
THAT is how Kremlin views contracts. English law? Bullshit. The FIRST thing Kremlin would and will likely do in case of contract dispute is claim that they are being persecuted under English law due to the Litvenenko debacle and ongoing fallout from that. True or not is irrelevant.
They can and will do one of two things. One, they can cover with that and take Nigerian gas and do whatever they damned well please with it. Screw Europe or anyone else with "contractual agreements." Hell, UK won't even let slide one murder of a British citizen on British soil by a Rooskie spook, so how can Europe be trusted and why should they even matter? That's how Kremlin sees things.
Two, they can simply forego any pretenses and ignore contractual obligations altogether. In Nigeria? Is it possible? Nigeria is more corrupt than Russia, and that's saying something. Nigeria's goombahs are in it for cold, hard cash. Russia's goombahs want in because 1) they know perfectly well how corrupt Nigeria's guys are, and 2) they'll have their own gas supplies in Africa to be dealt the same way as Russian gas. I.e., contracts as described above. The latter is all about control of Europe, and that IS Russia's main point. If they get into Nigeria, there's nothing to prevent wholesale looting and diversion from anyone Kremlin doesn't like. Such as the free world, for example.
Kremlin is looking for energy hegemony, in my opinion. I think that's what this is about.
Meantime, note to Kremlin: please, please, please oh please don't invest your temporary fortune into an energy resource that has to be phased out (else global suicide) or you'll just be losing your money, go broke again, and have nothing else of much value on the world commodity market. Whatever you do, don't invest your cash wisely.
Now that they've been told not to do it or are being strongly contested in doing it, they will. Thus maybe a little more to this squabble than meets the eye at first glance.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter.
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 21 13 comments
by Cat - Feb 18 10 comments
by ATinNM - Feb 6 22 comments
by Oui - Feb 12 16 comments
by Oui - Jan 26 3 comments
by Oui - Feb 14 1 comment
by gmoke - Feb 13
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 5 10 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 2113 comments
by Cat - Feb 1810 comments
by Oui - Feb 175 comments
by Oui - Feb 141 comment
by gmoke - Feb 13
by Oui - Feb 1216 comments
by Oui - Feb 12
by Oui - Feb 86 comments
by Oui - Feb 71 comment
by ATinNM - Feb 622 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 510 comments
by Oui - Feb 42 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 254 comments
by Cat - Feb 18 comments
by Oui - Feb 1
by Oui - Feb 129 comments
by Oui - Jan 302 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 2936 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 2811 comments
by Oui - Jan 263 comments