Display:
See quote from the foreign minister in the diary text!

they still ended up essentially trying to force non-Slovenians out

Well, some non-Slovenians. Not that plain racism would be better (it's worse), but the situation of ethnic minorities other than Roma and Serb is much better than elsewhere. Say, language use in official situations, inluding village name tables in different languages has been an issue all across the region, even in Austria, but not in Slovenia.

On the referendum: I did remember the issue vaguely, but I was a bit incredulous and had to check. I find (1) the 3 April 2004 referendum was non-binding, (2) participation was a mere 31%, (3) that after opponents called for a boycott. (Still, sadly I suspect they could well have had a - narrow - majority had there been no boycott, I found reports of late 2003 - early 2004 polls on the issue.)

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Mon Jan 7th, 2008 at 04:36:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I've never really understood boycotting elections and referendums, because if one entire side boycotts, the other side wins. Then whatever horrible law or corrupt official the boycott was in response to passes/gets in office. I can understand calling an election a farce, etc., but boycotts just seem pointless to me....
by lychee on Mon Jan 7th, 2008 at 05:53:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't know Slovenian law, but referendums often have a validity threshold on participation. This can be 50%, 25%, 25% of total population for the winner, or something similar. (Notable exceptions are Ireland and Switzerland.)

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Jan 7th, 2008 at 05:58:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Forgot: the EU referendum and the last elections saw turnouts just above 60%, compare 95% of 31% to that.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Jan 7th, 2008 at 06:04:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series