Accordign now to (ref article) there has been a dramatic change of attitude and discourse in the UK government and main financial sectors regarding the lasts years of economic policy. It is with surprise that I read how they complain about having exactly what was desired: market-driven results which lead to increase in Energy prices. After 20 years of the UK lecturing continental Europe that it was silly to have an "energy policy" because "the market provides", one can hardly not feel the schadenfreude when the obvious results of such lecturing gets the expected results.
The rush to produce gas in the past decades and a parallel rush to build gas-fired power plants at the same time without thinking in the lack of european reserves , and, additionally, the break-up of the industry and its sale in pieces to the stodgy utilities which were widely thought to have overpaid for the assets necessarily lead to higher market prices.
Markets do not deliver lower prices, they deliver truer prices. And the true price of energy now, if you have not planned infrastructure and supply in the previous decades, is going up. But I guess it is easier to blame the Europeans.
It is just a frist trial... someon takes it from her..
A pleasure I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude
According to (ref article) there has been a dramatic change in attitude from the UK government about the last twenty years of energy policy. It is remarkable to see ministers complaining about high prices created by the negative results of deregulation when the current increases were both predictable and expected. After 20 years of rhetoric from the UK about the irrelevance of long term energy planning in favour of overzealous reliance on the markets - which supposedly not only create lower prices for consumers but guarantee stability of supply - it's hard not to feel schadenfreude when the result turns out to be higher prices for consumers and industry, and increasingly precarious supply to both consumers and businesses. The rush to build gas-fired power plants without factoring in the likely effect of minimal European reserves, and the break-up and sale of a functional utility sector at generous discounts is now producing effects which should be no surprise to anyone, least of all Mr Darling and his Treasury colleagues. Unregulated markets do not deliver lower prices and long-term stability, they deliver higher profits infected with rampant short-termism. This creates chaotic supply conditions and makes energy price planning by industry almost impossible. Enron proved this, and now Mr Darling is finding out why he should have perhaps have been paying attention to recent history in the US. Europe meanwhile has understood this for decades; unfortunately common wisdom in the UK still seems to lagging some way behind common sense.
After 20 years of rhetoric from the UK about the irrelevance of long term energy planning in favour of overzealous reliance on the markets - which supposedly not only create lower prices for consumers but guarantee stability of supply - it's hard not to feel schadenfreude when the result turns out to be higher prices for consumers and industry, and increasingly precarious supply to both consumers and businesses.
The rush to build gas-fired power plants without factoring in the likely effect of minimal European reserves, and the break-up and sale of a functional utility sector at generous discounts is now producing effects which should be no surprise to anyone, least of all Mr Darling and his Treasury colleagues.
Unregulated markets do not deliver lower prices and long-term stability, they deliver higher profits infected with rampant short-termism. This creates chaotic supply conditions and makes energy price planning by industry almost impossible.
Enron proved this, and now Mr Darling is finding out why he should have perhaps have been paying attention to recent history in the US. Europe meanwhile has understood this for decades; unfortunately common wisdom in the UK still seems to lagging some way behind common sense.
it is up to jerome now to take the different option in the thread and submit it with minor changes...
According to (ref article), the UK government's attitude to the last couple of decades of energy policy has undergone a dramatic change. It is remarkable to see ministers complaining about high prices created by the negative results of deregulation, when the current increases were both predictable and expected. The rush to build gas-fired power plants without factoring in the likely effect of minimal European reserves, and the break-up and sale of a functional utility sector at generous discounts, is now producing effects which should be no surprise to anyone, least of all Mr Darling and his Treasury colleagues. For twenty years the UK has lectured about the irrelevance of long term energy planning and the virtues of reliance on the markets - which supposedly not only create lower prices for consumers but guarantee stability of supply. It's hard today not to feel schadenfreude when the result turns out to be higher prices and increasingly precarious supply for both consumers and businesses. Unregulated markets do not deliver lower prices and long-term stability, they deliver higher profits infected with rampant short-termism. This creates chaotic supply conditions and makes energy price planning by industry almost impossible. Enron proved this, and now Mr Darling is finding out why he should have perhaps have been paying attention to recent history in the US. The rest of Europe meanwhile has understood this all along; unfortunately common wisdom in the UK still seems to lagging some way behind common sense.
The rush to build gas-fired power plants without factoring in the likely effect of minimal European reserves, and the break-up and sale of a functional utility sector at generous discounts, is now producing effects which should be no surprise to anyone, least of all Mr Darling and his Treasury colleagues.
For twenty years the UK has lectured about the irrelevance of long term energy planning and the virtues of reliance on the markets - which supposedly not only create lower prices for consumers but guarantee stability of supply. It's hard today not to feel schadenfreude when the result turns out to be higher prices and increasingly precarious supply for both consumers and businesses.
Enron proved this, and now Mr Darling is finding out why he should have perhaps have been paying attention to recent history in the US. The rest of Europe meanwhile has understood this all along; unfortunately common wisdom in the UK still seems to lagging some way behind common sense.
