Am I supposed to take this kind of rambling seriously:
Well I stared off with a sympathetic mind on the smearing of Dawkins. I was less open to some of Dawkins arguments. Some of his arguemts I think are interesting and under some circumstances would be interesting to debate. Did nanne go overbord? I still don't have enough information to form an opinion. On the other hand the defense of Dawkins so far is none to pretty either. And then there is Hitchens.
What is the "none to [sic] pretty" part of the defense ? Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner - that I moved to Nice.
We are meant to be impressed with the evils of religion and regaled with the Battle of Jericho. Alternative explanations are not listed. Einstein said Nationalism is an infantile disease. What role did religion play? What role did nationalism play? What would Jewish children who did not believe in god think? We have no answers and are thus little wiser. Simple truths to mask complex questions, such as "Does religion manipulate and control society? Is it the other way around? Is it a two way street?" "As society changes, does religion change?" "Do we create god in our own image, or does religion create us in its own image?" Is Skinner correct or is he wrong?
Nationalism is an infantile disease.
What role did religion play? What role did nationalism play? What would Jewish children who did not believe in god think? We have no answers and are thus little wiser. Simple truths to mask complex questions, such as "Does religion manipulate and control society? Is it the other way around? Is it a two way street?" "As society changes, does religion change?" "Do we create god in our own image, or does religion create us in its own image?" Is Skinner correct or is he wrong?
Instead you are interested in pretending that I have said nothing at all. You are trying to score cheap debating points as opposed to something more serious.
If you don't want to answer my criticisms then don't. Don't pretend that I have not made any.
I will no longer be reading your responses on this topic.
aspiring to genteel poverty
Oh dear. For anybody else - the bit you quoted from your comment is not exactly coherent - you seem to be complaining that Dawkins doesn't deal with all the possible issues you can dream up. You don't clearly set out anything specific he says and show what's wrong with it.
Simple truths to mask complex questions
Exactly which supposed "simple truths" ? Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner - that I moved to Nice.