Display:
http://www.russiatoday.com/news/news/31680
U.S. nuked Iraq during Gulf War - report
An American war veteran has claimed that the U.S. dropped a nuclear bomb during the last days of the first Gulf War in Iraq in 1991.

Jim Brown, a mechanic in the U.S. Army's 10th Mountain Division at the time, told Italian channel RaiNews24 that coalition forces dropped a 5-kilotonne nuclear bomb in a deserted area near the city of Basra.

by vbo on Mon Oct 13th, 2008 at 09:31:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Come on...!

Seriosly people!

If that isn't a perfect example of time-honed crackpot Russian paranoia, then I don't know what is.

And it's published by Russia Today, a major state-funded Russian news outlet.

Remember this the next time you hear something from Russian media, ranking just below the Congo in terms of freedom of the press.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Mon Oct 13th, 2008 at 12:21:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually, it seems to have originated with RAI:
According to RaiNews24, a five-kilotonne blast equalled a 4.2 magnitude quake in the Richter scale.

The network cited the online archives of the International Seismological Center, a non-profit UK-based organisation, as confirmation of its research.

The blast is catalogued with the number 342793, which took place on 27 February at 1:39pm. The blast was reportedly registered in nine seismic centres, two in Iran, four in Nepal, one in Canada, one in Sweden and one in Norway.

However, the same article claims:
Lt. Col. Patrick Ryder, a media spokesman for the department, told Adnkronos International (AKI) that the US used "only conventional weapons" during the Gulf War.

[...]

"The US maintains a number of munitions that have an explosive capability of 5000 pounds (2300 kilogrammes) and larger," Ryder told AKI in a written statement.

by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Wed Oct 15th, 2008 at 06:57:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
RAI... Isn't that the same crackpots who thought the US used chemical weapons in the second battle of Fallujah?

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Wed Oct 15th, 2008 at 11:00:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think they are... but I quoted this story as it does have enough facts that could be checked if somebody really thinks it's worth the bother, and it also undermines the Russian story by providing an alternative explanation.
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Wed Oct 15th, 2008 at 11:42:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
and they didn't use the resulting radiation as proof that the Iraquis had had WMD?

you're having a laugh, if you're going to push out bullshit at least push out believable bullshit.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.

by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Mon Oct 13th, 2008 at 12:39:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't know what is believable nowadays. Do I believe ANYTHING USA/UK (or western) media (generally) is presenting ...fuck NO.They are NOT more credible then PRAVDA (in communists times)in my eyes. Lies. lies and lies...I post Russian media just to let you know that as far as credibility goes they are totally same for me as western...propaganda and lies...I do not actually believe both of them and am having a good laugh with BBC, CNN etc.same as with RIA , Russia today etc.
by vbo on Sat Oct 18th, 2008 at 10:38:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That was in 1991 - the US wasn't interested in bringing up Saddam's WMDs at that time.

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Oct 18th, 2008 at 10:47:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series