Display:
and they didn't use the resulting radiation as proof that the Iraquis had had WMD?

you're having a laugh, if you're going to push out bullshit at least push out believable bullshit.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.

by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Mon Oct 13th, 2008 at 12:39:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't know what is believable nowadays. Do I believe ANYTHING USA/UK (or western) media (generally) is presenting ...fuck NO.They are NOT more credible then PRAVDA (in communists times)in my eyes. Lies. lies and lies...I post Russian media just to let you know that as far as credibility goes they are totally same for me as western...propaganda and lies...I do not actually believe both of them and am having a good laugh with BBC, CNN etc.same as with RIA , Russia today etc.
by vbo on Sat Oct 18th, 2008 at 10:38:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That was in 1991 - the US wasn't interested in bringing up Saddam's WMDs at that time.

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Oct 18th, 2008 at 10:47:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series