Display:
Which would make NATO at best an inapt and inept organisation bogged down by disagreements among its members or at worst an instrument of the neocons to further spread their insane agenda. Either way, not an organisation well suited for peace-keeping.

"The basis of optimism is sheer terror" - Oscar Wilde
by NordicStorm (michael<-at->sturmbaum.net) on Sat Oct 11th, 2008 at 02:33:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The neocons are going down. No one trust them anymore, not after their repeated failures.

I must say NATO has been extremely good at peace keeping. It kept the Russians from invading all through the cold war, and it will keep that peace in the future too.

These colonial police actions which are often labeled peace keeping is nothing for NATO to deal with though - that was just to give the organisation a raison d'être until the Russians got back on their feet.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Sat Oct 11th, 2008 at 03:04:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
But just about everyone with any sort of influence in American foreign policy are in agreement with the neocon faction on the basic foundation for how the US is to operate in relation to the rest of the world; if the international community disagree with a particular American stance, the US will simply bypass the international community, even if it involves military operations. Which would still leave NATO as described.

Aha, so it was directed at Russia after all! Good news for the once and future Communist fighters that they'll have a real enemy again, I suppose. Too bad that proxy war in Georgia didn't work out too well.

"The basis of optimism is sheer terror" - Oscar Wilde

by NordicStorm (michael<-at->sturmbaum.net) on Sat Oct 11th, 2008 at 03:36:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You are mixing apples and oranges.

Worrying about Russian is not being a neocon, it's just taking a sober look at the last century and seeing Europe can be a very nasty place.

if the international community disagree with a particular American stance, the US will simply bypass the international community, even if it involves military operations.

This is not neoconservatism, it's plain ole realpolitik. Using your definition Russia, China and lots of other countries would also be neoconservative. They aren't.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Sat Oct 11th, 2008 at 04:10:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series