Display:
Too damn expensive to rotate so far. Think of the fuel. Think that you have to maintaint a deterrent presence on a continuous basis, it must be very cost-efficient.

Besides, you wouldn't want to do this with a fighter bomber. What you need is a few propeller patrol aircrafts to monitor the area, and a flotilla of armored multi-role helicopters like CH-53G for the actual interventions. Even a frigate is not appropriate against the kind of very light boats used by the pirates.

Ain't nothing we do not already have. Even the support bases (think Djibouti). It's only a question of political will and funding.

Pierre

by Pierre on Wed Oct 15th, 2008 at 08:13:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Huh? I was talking in the context of securing a bridgehead in the event of a colonial war stabilisation effort, not a routine anti-piracy operation. Pirates in the Med aren't that big a problem, AFAIK.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed Oct 15th, 2008 at 01:29:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series