Why couldn't government offer that banking competition, instead of distributing allowances? Libertarian exclusion of government from markets takes away some crucial salt from the economic ecosystem, I think.
Commercial banking needs competition now. What else would move banks to do what they are supposed to do - to lend?
Capital injected into sound banks would be lent to credit-worthy borrowers. If these banks lacked experienced commercial banking officers, there should be many looking for positions about now. Part of the FDIC's procedure for disposing of insolvent banks should be to see that the commercial lending operations of such banks are taken over by certified sound banks and that new capital proportionate to that department's size be injected into the recipient bank.
Why couldn't government offer that banking competition, instead of distributing allowances?
Bruce McF has suggested upgrading credit unions to full service banks. That should also work. Why Paulson is not being called out for only taking obviously doomed actions is beyond my limited understanding if indeed there are explanations beyond my cynical expectations of his desiring to protect his cronies and his being blind to the needs of anyone outside of the world he came from. As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
I am still trying to understand how federal or private the Federal Reserve System is. "Conspiracy theorists" say that it is just as federal as Federal Express. Officially, it is quasi-public (government entity with private components), but how many quasi-public entities do we have? How is Federal Reserve accountable? How independent is politics from it?