Display:
So to translate from econospeak into English, aggressive outsourcing during the 80s and early 90s - which led to the oh-so-admired increase in corporate profits (and "competitiveness") that caused Japan to be revered as a model country for corporate governance - killed off the economy and led to Japan being dumped like an apple with a worm in it by the very same people who'd been so enthusiastically praising it just years before?

And these bizniz pundits who recommend outsourcing are being taken seriously because?

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Sat Oct 18th, 2008 at 12:30:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... when Japan in the middle of the lost decade, slammed its cash rate down to 0.1% ... that of course pushed the Yen from an importer's to an exporter's exchange rate, and as a side-effect destroyed the presumption behind the easy money games in Southeast Asia that the Yen would always be strong against the US$, so it would always be possible to borrow short in US$ and roll it over and pay back long using Yen earnings, combining a foreign exchange gain with the lower cost of short term finance.

How deliberate that timing was, or whether it just took the Japanese that long to decide upon such a dramatic monetary policy ... like I said, I don't understand Japanese political economy to really have any idea.

A little while after the outsourcing wave was over, the Japanese economy showed a return of stronger economic growth ... it was the shift from one level to another level so dramatically that led to the domestic investment drought in Japan ... at least, compared to prior levels of investment.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sat Oct 18th, 2008 at 05:57:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series