Display:
It's more the thought that there's nothing to stop him buying a house or a personal jet with it, if that's what he wanted to do.

It makes the lobbying business even grubbier because the cash isn't necessarily ring-fenced for public service, which really - in nicey nicey world - it ought to be, to whatever extent that's practical.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Fri Oct 17th, 2008 at 06:24:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
To be fair to all of them, I may be wrong about the legalities of it.  Ask me about how Milwaukee, WI, handles its sewerage and water supply, and I can tell you a lot.  Ask me the fine points of campaign finance law, and I'm bound to bullshit at least 20% of it. ;)

In the end, the model of lobbyists steering contributions is doomed, in my opinion, as far as it being a great way to gain influence goes.  It just can't compete with the small-donor model.  Both will go on, of course, but inevitably the influence of the lobbyist falls, especially when you can, as Obama has, run partly on not taking their money and perhaps get even more donations.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin

by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Fri Oct 17th, 2008 at 06:42:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series