Display:
It's a real issue, and a frustrating one for me. I've tried to keep the FP balanced in terms of gender (we had SusanHu initially, DeAnander, then poemless, and now stormy and Izzy who have unfortunately not been around much), but either out of unavailability, bad luck, or chasing them away (and that's the real question) they have not influenced the FP as much as I would have liked.

I would still note that both Fran and In Wales post regularly, with their themes, and definitely influence the site, in a very positive way. I can only encourage others to do the same.

Or maybe I should write less?

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sat Oct 18th, 2008 at 05:18:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You certainly shouldn't write less!

I don't think the issue is that there is too much of your stuff or too much of a certain theme but more that there is not enough of other themes.  It's a bit chicken and egg - we need more themes that appeal to a broader range of interests, but we also need people with a broader range of interests to write the diaries and comment on them and thus fuel more interest...

I wish I had more time to write about all the things that interest me.

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Sat Oct 18th, 2008 at 05:49:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks for writing my comment, In Wales. I absolutely agree!

And I also think that for Jérôme to write less is not the answer. But having broader topics and views, hopefully also more writing from women would be very helpful.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Oct 18th, 2008 at 06:00:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Don't.You.Dare!, write less, or more for a pointless  reason.

This is not, repeat, NOT, about changing anyone to accommodate anyone else!!!  That would become a resentment that leads nowhere.  Integrating men and women in a natural way should be ....´nat-ur-al´ and not some business textbook nonsense that just becomes another excuse not to do it.  

This is about being conscious, aware and respectful about 'the other'.  That´s all!  ´The other´ being women, being the poor, being other races, being......    It´s doing what you do in a social context.  It's that simple.  

Our knowledge has surpassed our wisdom. -Charu Saxena.

by metavision on Sat Oct 18th, 2008 at 06:17:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The social contexts of an online community are not fully understood yet. At ET we are trying  to work them out, along with many other communities.

Prior to the Intertubes, social contexts were often discrete. Family conversations, pub dirtdishing about the bosses, poker players' interdeal chitchats, teenage BFFs up in the bedroom, stag nights, hen nights, board rooms, club discussions, AA meetings, WI lectures, cafes, bus stops. Each context has its own rules and freedoms. Each context has its own behaviours. They were discrete because they were rarely overheard - 'were' because many of these contexts are now eavesdropped upon.

In online communities, almost everything is 'overheard'. We carry over our RW behaviours into this world because we are lazy. We haven't yet adjusted to the overhearing. But it will come - if we persist in the right spirit. An online community will become another discrete social context with its own rules and freedoms.

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Sat Oct 18th, 2008 at 06:52:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
unavailability, bad luck, or chasing them away (and that's the real question)

Well, SusanHu has gone insane, DeAnander has gone feral and poemless is still here (and taking the top two slots on the recommended diaries list.

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Oct 18th, 2008 at 10:18:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series