Display:
OTOH, you have such things as fibre optics, communication satellites, GPS and transistors, where a fairly detailed understanding of the underlying science is necessary to make it work at all in the first place.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Mon Oct 20th, 2008 at 11:32:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, no rule without exceptions. In history at least.

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
by A swedish kind of death on Mon Oct 20th, 2008 at 11:43:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You're confusing levels. Getting it to work is science. Making it work so that people can use it without understanding it is technology and engineering.

I can plug a TOSLINK cable into my Mac, wire it up to a DAC, and get music out of it. I don't need to know about semiconductor band gaps, optical transmittivity, coding protocols, dither, or clock jitter.

Assuming I have the very basic level of knowledge needed to understand that I'm supposed to plug it into a DAC and not my ear, and as long as something isn't broken, it will just work for me.

Obviously if you're an engineer it's your job to know more, and to understand how to wave dead chickens and oscilloscopes around. But if you do your properly most people won't need to get that hands-on.

Woo woo tends not to be that reliable. Sometimes interesting, surprising, exotic and baffling things happen, but just as often nothing significant happens at all.

Maybe if we had a unified theory of woo woo it would work reliably. Or maybe it's perpetually liminal and just doesn't work like that.

No one knows. Camps on both sides assume they do, but really they don't at all.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Mon Oct 20th, 2008 at 12:14:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series