Display:
JakeS:
In principle, one could falsify the assumption that consciousness cannot exist outside the brain by finding consciousness outside the brain. If one were to make - say - a golem, it would certainly cause much rethinking of the meaning of consciousness, as would the discovery of a species similar to the Hooloovoo.

How do you measure consciousness, what is your definition? Would an advanced enough AI satisfy?

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!

by A swedish kind of death on Sat Oct 18th, 2008 at 06:27:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Sure, an advanced AI could work. But an advanced AI embedded in an advanced computer system would have a "brain." An advanced AI embedded in a lump of clay would not.

At the end of the day, a Hoovooloo may be a more convincing example.

It's a quite tall order. Then again, spirits are a quite extraordinary claim.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Sun Oct 19th, 2008 at 12:19:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
There's been a cross-discipline spat going on between those who think AI is possible, those who think it isn't, and some who are asking, "What do you mean by intelligence?"

One source of the discussion is the lack of a Formal, testable, and commonly accepted, definition of either "consciousness" or "intelligence."  

by ATinNM on Sun Oct 19th, 2008 at 12:44:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series