'A structured explanatory communication, supported by empirical evidence'
as opposed to the common definition:
'a bunch of words tacked together in an effort to 'splain somethin'
The Theory of Evolution is a means of understanding and partakes of the first.
The Theory of Intelligent Design is a bunch of nonsense and partakes of the latter.
I am familiar with the 'Gita, as well as the Mahabharata, BTW. I find it hard to accept as empirical evidence or an explanation of such.
I would not rule out the possibility of identifying states of consciousness or attributes of the human mind that could readily explain experiences such as yours, that of Crazy Horse or some of my own and others and that could be related to the Perennial Philosophy described by Huxley in the introduction. Most work in psychology through Fechner was done in the light of the traditions of the Perennial Philosophy. However Fechner's observation that sense perception related to sensual stimulation by the logarithm of the stimulus was seized upon by those who followed Fechner to drive Psyche out of Psychology. For most of a century Psyche was entrusted to the care of Procrustes in the guise of scientific reductionism, with some exceptions. The subject of a future diary, perhaps. As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."