Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
Display:
Their largest vote total was received prior to World War I.  Resistance to the US involvement in WW I, the Palmer Red Raids, and internal split on Bolshevik Revolution reduced them to insignificance as a party.

Thank you for adding crucial historical benchmarks and qualification of party "significance" restricted to votes. But is that really an appropriate measure of the party's influence on "national policy"?

I would think the continuity of US federal law and police actions to destroy this (third) party's apparatus and political alliances across the labor movement was a significant feature of national policy.  

If not, I still must wonder about the popularity of socialism within FDR's administration and right up to the end of WWII, while Russia enjoined favored nation status. Wilkie's "One World" tour was quite the money-maker, no?

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Mon Oct 20th, 2008 at 02:04:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:

Display:

Top Diaries

It's "Whose Economy, Stupid?"

by Helen - Aug 3
1 comment

In which I defend Wolfgang Schäuble

by rz - Jul 15
24 comments

I'm done with the EU

by tyronen - Jul 13
228 comments

The Greece Blame Game

by Frank Schnittger - Jul 20
30 comments

The democractic insolvency

by rz - Jul 16
23 comments

Occasional Series