Display:
I was watching a spokesperson from this particular group of propagandists on the BBC News channel yesterday. There message seemed could be distilled into three components:

  1. Interest rate cuts
  2. Tax Cuts - they did not specify for whom these tax cuts should be you can guess (I would guess that if we got the targets of these tax cuts wrong they would should "welfare" at the top of their lungs).
  3. If you must spend money then you should give the money to the private sector (give us your money). The usual bullshytt were given = governments can't spend money properly, we can - blah, blah, blah, blah).

The BBC guy gave him a hard time but an opposing view was not to be found. My guess is that this has less to do with the BBC's (or any other 24 hour news organisation) willingness to book somebody but that other orgs do not put people up to talk.  

Snippets of this interview were repeated constantly throughout the day.

Howard Dean said the first thing Democrats needed to do was turn up. He was right.


Money is a sign of Poverty - Culture Saying

by RogueTrooper on Tue Oct 28th, 2008 at 12:01:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The right-wing tendencies of the British blogosphere are rather depressingly evident on this issue also.

1) There's a strong concentration on technicalities at the expense of the political message being pushed.

- For example a lot of concentration on the technical notions that a cut in low earner tax (e.g. a NI holiday) would feed into the economy quicker than infrastructure:

- No mention of the role of infrastructure contracts in slowing the collapse of construction employment.

- No mention that infrastructure spending provides more stimulus than tax cuts.

- No mention that in a highly indebted environment, low end tax cuts are as vulnerable as other money supply measures to "pushing on a string" problems.

2) Most of all however, no mention, as you note that they wouldn't actually be proposing a tax cut for the low end, let alone a tax cut for the low end only.

3) The allocative efficiency argument is so depressing, as we face a crisis built up out of the misallocation of resources by the market over a long period.

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Tue Oct 28th, 2008 at 12:13:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
>The right-wing tendencies of the British blogosphere
There too?!  I am going to have to let my subscription to the Economist lapse.  I can no longer bring myself to read very much of it.  Obviously outrageous tendentious misrepresentations in too many articles.  In the rare instances where a Serious Person makes a sensible suggestion that has unfortunate consequences for the backers of their ideology, they will sieze upon some possible misinterpretation or manufacture some silly claim to which they then respond.  I see enough of that from the McCain Campaign.  The money spent on this subscription would buy us better quality toilet paper for a year.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Tue Oct 28th, 2008 at 02:53:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series