Display:
''Most subscribers came in at the top of the market," Gilder recalls of those dark days, when even his chief financial officer filed a lawsuit against him. ''So the modal experience of the Gilder Technology Newsletter subscriber was to lose virtually all of his money. That stigma has been very hard to overcome."(my bold)
Amazing how unforgiving the wealthy can be!  Burn me once, shit on you!  Hopefully Gilder is now practicing his arts in some sunny clime of a developing nation, refining his art of gilding bubbles.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Tue Oct 28th, 2008 at 01:52:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It's well worth reading the rest of the feature, because it makes sich a clear connection between the mental states that give rise to evangelical fundie kookiness and evangelical economic kookiness.

The process is very meta, but also very predictable - all it takes is a certain kind of emotional signalling and you can sell almost anything in the US. (And to a not so obvious extent elsewhere too.)

Without common sense or restraint, disaster follows.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Oct 28th, 2008 at 03:13:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It is one thing to maintain the compatibility of science with religion, especially with the theory of evolution, which Ayala, a PhD molecular biologist and ordained Dominican Priest, uses to resolve the problem of evil in Creation with the nature of God  in the most recent Scientific American.  It is something else to do what Gilder seems to attempt with Intelligent Design.  

Citing Claude Shannon of Bell Labs in this regard is particularly offensive to me, given my regard for his contributions: grounding information and communications theory in thermodynamics through the recognition that the meaning in a text or the usefulness of a library was due to the work that had been done against entropy in the creation of that order and that transmission degradation constituted an increase in entropy.  He and Warren Weaver presented this in an accessible form in  The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, 1949.  This was after writing a Masters Thesis at MIT in which he described vacuum tube operational amplifiers; described their possible applications  mathematically and showed how they could be applied as analog computers continuously solving the problem of aiming naval guns on a moving platform aiming at a moving target.  His Masters Thesis at MIT  was immediately classified and used to design the fire control systems on allied ships during WWII.

Gilder's arguments that the amount of information contained in the genetic code and the elegance of its organization  can only be explained by the presence of an intelligent creator remains a giant non sequitur.  It is and has been refuted by experiment over and over and only reveals his predisposition: there must be a theistic deity "up there" like a super father who is making sure everything is ok.  That is a far cry from Ayala's position, which is essentially naturalistic.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Oct 29th, 2008 at 01:06:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes. See below. And the Ayala article is an interesting  find-thanks.

Capitalism searches out the darkest corners of human potential, and mainlines them.
by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Wed Oct 29th, 2008 at 06:36:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's hardly Gilder's argument. He stole it from some chaps at the Institute for Creation Research [sic]. An entire subsection of the Index to Creationist Claims is devoted to it.

Creationists (and Intelligent Design Creationists) have only about 20 arguments all told, and not one of them is younger than I am - they just dress them up in different language all the time.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed Oct 29th, 2008 at 01:20:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes- good feature indeed. Revealing, but gently so.
In conversation, Gilder is something of a rhetorical hummingbird, darting from topic to topic so rapidly it's difficult to get a word (much less a question) in edgewise. Each topic arrives with its own set of footnotes, reference texts, and unvarnished -- some might say unhinged -- opinions. Predictable Gilder is not, however. On balance, it's much easier to peg him as a hip-shooting contrarian than a cookie-cutter conservative or raving holy roller.

Much kinder description than mine would have been, I fear.
The most interesting issue for me is this:
I think these guys- these "Prophets"- believe their own bullshit.
Gilder assembles packages of useful self-delusion--marketable self-delusion. Like Uncle Milty, like Leo Strauss, etc, they cherry-pick the data to assemble marketable (and internally satisfying) narrative packages, and use their considerable skills in selling them.
Yes, there is a ready market for camouflage for plunder a la the "Chicago School" and Friedman, and the scent of frying neurons- slow-cooked over a fire of megalomaniac desires- is strong with George also. Along with more than a whiff of Authoritarian, patriarchal needs. When faced with alien evidence, they just change the conversation, and are incredibly resistant to change the shtick.  
So is there a unified field theory to Gilder's work? Some thread that connects his interest in everything from supply-side economics to stay-at-home moms? Yes, says Gilder, looking beyond his balcony and across the verdant valley adjoining the farmland he still calls his own. There is.

''Much of what I've written about has been in reaction to the materialist superstition," he says, ''the belief that the universe is a purely material phenomenon that can be reduced to physical and chemical laws. It's a concept that's infected the social sciences as well."

And, he adds, ''it's preposterous."

In this, he's right.
The bold portion represents perhaps the single overlap between my world view and that of Gilder.

We do, however, see very different ways to resolve the failure of the "clockwork universe" as an adequate description of the world.

Capitalism searches out the darkest corners of human potential, and mainlines them.

by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Wed Oct 29th, 2008 at 06:33:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series