Display:
It is one thing to maintain the compatibility of science with religion, especially with the theory of evolution, which Ayala, a PhD molecular biologist and ordained Dominican Priest, uses to resolve the problem of evil in Creation with the nature of God  in the most recent Scientific American.  It is something else to do what Gilder seems to attempt with Intelligent Design.  

Citing Claude Shannon of Bell Labs in this regard is particularly offensive to me, given my regard for his contributions: grounding information and communications theory in thermodynamics through the recognition that the meaning in a text or the usefulness of a library was due to the work that had been done against entropy in the creation of that order and that transmission degradation constituted an increase in entropy.  He and Warren Weaver presented this in an accessible form in  The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, 1949.  This was after writing a Masters Thesis at MIT in which he described vacuum tube operational amplifiers; described their possible applications  mathematically and showed how they could be applied as analog computers continuously solving the problem of aiming naval guns on a moving platform aiming at a moving target.  His Masters Thesis at MIT  was immediately classified and used to design the fire control systems on allied ships during WWII.

Gilder's arguments that the amount of information contained in the genetic code and the elegance of its organization  can only be explained by the presence of an intelligent creator remains a giant non sequitur.  It is and has been refuted by experiment over and over and only reveals his predisposition: there must be a theistic deity "up there" like a super father who is making sure everything is ok.  That is a far cry from Ayala's position, which is essentially naturalistic.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Oct 29th, 2008 at 01:06:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes. See below. And the Ayala article is an interesting  find-thanks.

Capitalism searches out the darkest corners of human potential, and mainlines them.
by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Wed Oct 29th, 2008 at 06:36:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's hardly Gilder's argument. He stole it from some chaps at the Institute for Creation Research [sic]. An entire subsection of the Index to Creationist Claims is devoted to it.

Creationists (and Intelligent Design Creationists) have only about 20 arguments all told, and not one of them is younger than I am - they just dress them up in different language all the time.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed Oct 29th, 2008 at 01:20:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series