Display:
banks would no longer be involved in backing the guarantee at all: the sellers and buyers collectively would do that (back-stopped by governments).

Anyone can contribute a fraction of the capital backing the the guarantee - it doesn't have to be sellers or buyers, it could be unitised and sold, and the (non-redeemable) units traded in a secondary market.

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Oct 29th, 2008 at 09:41:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That is true, of course, but the likelihood is that it would be the stakeholders/ end-users themselves who would provide the necessary collateral.

I'm reminded of the strange fact that Mega Corporations like Shell and BP appear quite happy to have the likes of the London Clearing House ("LCH") and now the proprietary silo

ICE Futures Europe Clearing

as a counterparty, when in fact LCH's (and ICE's) capital base isn't even a pimple on their financial arse.

I guess, these End Users have probably regarded LCH as having an implicit government guarantee and they may well have been right.

But since ICE Futures Europe operates For Profit it shouldn't be able to rely upon governments....

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Wed Oct 29th, 2008 at 09:59:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That sounds like an... interesting story.

Care to describe it in a little more detail?

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed Oct 29th, 2008 at 01:40:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series