Display:
Systemic Fiscal Reform

is an interesting new site.

I met one of its protagonists, a Tory councillor called Robin Smith, at the recent Claverton Group conference. It appears to me that the most natural home politically for these ideas is in fact the LibDems - who narrowly failed to introduce a Land Tax in 1908 - but I don't think that it is possible to pigeonhole them as conventionally Left or Right

I am also engaged in a dialogue with Dr Adrian Wrigley - the intellectual source of the site - in relation to my thinking re Community Land Partnerships and consensual alternatives to taxation, among other things.

In particular I think that they lack a narrative, and for me the underlying theme underpinning such Systemic Fiscal Reform is the taxation of the privilege of exclusive use of Commons.

I therefore suggested to them that in addition to taxing land rental value and carbon use they should also be looking at taxation of limitation of liability.

That way they will be addressing the privilege of private ownership of all three of the principal Commons: Land; Non-Renewable Energy; and Knowledge.

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Fri Oct 31st, 2008 at 05:49:47 AM EST
they should also be looking at taxation of limitation of liability

That is interesting.

What about taxing ability to limit others?

by das monde on Fri Oct 31st, 2008 at 06:23:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
das monde:
What about taxing ability to limit others?

Could you give an example?

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Fri Oct 31st, 2008 at 08:00:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You may call it taxation of power. Say, I do not really like a business environment where you (realistically) either have to become a big shark or go bust. I do not wish to take everything it takes to get sharky. The problem is to restrict or impede the power of sharks to take over my little business. One way is to make laws and rules; other way is to tax their power - let them roam, but impede their freedom with a taxing compensation. As wealth correlates with power in this world, and wealth is easily measurable, we come close to an interesting justification of taxing wealth (as a first approximation).
by das monde on Sat Nov 1st, 2008 at 11:35:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
A political contribution tax that commences above, say, 2x median net worth or 3x median income, depending on how is best to proceed, might be one approach. Have the bracket go up 10% for each additional multiple.  There could be an exemption of the equivalent of, say, the first $100/ candidate or issue.

Another possibility would be a merger and acquisition tax that scales according to the size of the merged entity.  Then we could let the magic of the market determine just  what was the economy of scale.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sun Nov 2nd, 2008 at 01:31:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series