The 2 might interest you (as feedback for better communication). The paged you linked to was to me easier to understand because my flow of reading was not there stumped by quotes around individual words, which apparently makes me stop and figure that you are using the terms in different ways then the normal convention. So when you write:
As you will see if you look at the site, I use the Mobius strip as a metaphor for the continuity of such "Open" Capital - as compared to the "two sided" and therefore discontinuous conventional "Closed" forms of financial capital and property.
I figure that you mark "Open", "two sided" and "Closed" as having a different meaning then Open, two sided and Closed. So for me it is much easier if you write:
As you will see if you look at the site, I use the Mobius strip as a metaphor for the continuity of such Open Capital - as compared to the two sided and therefore discontinuous conventional closed forms of financial capital and property.
Before then I assume that all words are used in their conventional way and go for the meaning of the sentence rather then individual words.
I do not want to presume that this is a general experience, but as you are communicating to an audience, some might share this experience. Take it as feedback, and use it (or not).
And good luck in Teheran!
I will attempt to ration my use of quotes in the future.....!
But I agree, too much is too much - a stylistic blunder. You can't be me, I'm taken