Display:
Sounds like a good idea, I like it, and something de Gaulle would have liked. And if you work at a company which you think will kind of get into trouble you could always counter your "compulsory" shareholding by shorting the share at the same time.    

We have something like it in Sweden too at certain companies where employes often can buy a fixed amount of shares in their employee for a below market price. The problem here is that people are generally really bad at risk management, and lots of people will end up with large sums invested in this single company and no other companies.

So when the company falls on hard times you not only lose your job, but also your savings. This at the very time you would actually need those savings...

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Sat Oct 11th, 2008 at 09:05:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The problem is, a single employee is not all that responsible in the way his company's stock moves. Also, these stocks are usually held through mutual funds, which means the employee doesn't really get the vote his share of ownership grants him.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Sat Oct 11th, 2008 at 09:37:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series