European Tribune

Display:
In a LOT of places that Starbucks built, there was no competition at all.

Much of Americana suburbia was completely lacking in both coffee establishments, and in the kind of semi-public lounge space that Starbucks provides.

The "Starbucks destroys local competition" argument comes very loudly from the few places in the US that actually had coffee shops.

And, from what I experienced in the Ann Arbor, MI area, one of the reasons for Starbuck's success was the fact that it made better coffee (at least by my tastes) and had a better social environment than the competition.

It wasn't a better financed but generally inferior competitor - it was a better financed and generally equivalent competitor.

by Zwackus on Sun Oct 12th, 2008 at 12:48:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
20 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
76 comments

Help oppose Sarko's three strike nonsense
by nicta - Nov 20
6 comments

So I met Bill McKibben
by SacredCowTipper - Nov 20
2 comments

The Purpose of Education
by rdf - Nov 20
1 comment

LQD: Geoengineering Ranked
by nanne - Nov 19
18 comments

LQD: The real orgasmic Puritans
by Ted Welch - Nov 20
2 comments

Trains in Moravia
by DoDo - Nov 16
72 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series