Display:
Agreed that a certain amount of trial and error is inevitable and that a lack of coordination can also lead to greater local flexibility and creativity.  However the problems here are clearly global in scale and equally clearly require global solutions.  A small economy like Iceland is almost helpless, and a slightly larger one like Ireland has to adopt extreme solutions which may or may not set helpful precedents.

I hope you are not advocating a kind of economic/financial/political Darwinism when it comes to finding solutions - because that is what the fee marketeers used to advocate at a corporate level, and that didn't turn put very well.

Vote McCain for war without gain

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Wed Oct 8th, 2008 at 01:37:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The difference of the "new" Darwinism is that solutions are shared (to maximize overall fitness) rather than monopolized (to maximize relative fitness).

Europe has more resources to spread "hardships" more evenly across various sectors. They need less excuses to communalise some benefits of "necessary" bailouts. The uncertainty of centralized bailouts forces individual subjects to look for solutions themselves, reducing pressure on government and moral hazard. Europe still does not have its own mortgage crisis - or it would be milder, solvable even with assistance to homeowners.

by das monde on Wed Oct 8th, 2008 at 09:54:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series