Display:
Well... lemme chart some central points of that unborn diary.

  • There Is No Alternative is historically a very narrow view about a system barely 250 years old, whatever one thinks about the viability of Marxist alternatives
  • holding the levers of the economy is not yet capitalism
  • 'applied Marxism' doesn't start nor ends with state monopolism -- in fact in the end, even the state as we know it would go
  • what you said applies more to what was realised by Soviet-style communism, especially after the end of the NEP (which indeed some term state capitalism -- with the apparatchniks functioning de-facto owners of capital)
  • there are some non-Soviet examples (1956 Workers' Councils in Hungary, Zapatista villages in Chiapas)
  • Žizek is into analysisng, not into proscribing


*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 06:11:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Although this Žižek article may be topical.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 06:40:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It's not that there's absolutely no alternative. It's that the apocalypse has a better chance of happening than another economic system taking root.

And I never wrote about apparatchiks taking control of the levers.

Representatives of the proletariat do it, and thereby effectively redistribute the wealth.

The reason why Marxists I named aren't proscriptive is because they see no point in proscribing another system. But Zizek is proscriptive about a great many other things. From Darfur to the Balkans and a great many other situations, he has ventured into political proposals.

What do you mean by analyzing? It sounds like another one of these theory/practice divides that we're laboring under in this diary.

"Applied Marxism?"

by Upstate NY on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 08:03:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series