Display:
But in terms of who has more power? And more money also?

Business groups kick off about regulation and not letting the free market be truly free to let them do things how they wish to.

The UK unions are fairly restrained by legislation that limits their activities, US unions even more so. It isn't an even balance.

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 06:18:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
To expand on my comment to poemless: business interest groups are like the old pre-universal-suffrage voting system in various countries, when people's vote was weighted on the basis of their wealth.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 06:43:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You seem to be assuming some prinicple based on your own local experiences.  Here in America, unions have a ton of money, and I can assure you, not all gotten the honest way.  Heads of unions and CEOs are cut from the same cloth here.  And how much power do the unions have?  Well, there's a debate in Congress about bailing out the auto industry, which has repeatedly effed up, with our tax dollars.  Who is for it?  Dems.  Who does labor give money to?  Dems.  

Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
by poemless on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 06:54:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Union honchos can be as money-grubbing as middle-ranked managers, yes. But if you add up the money/campaign contributors of unions and divide it by union membership, and then add up the money/campaign contributors of business owners and CEOs and divide it by their numbers, I bet there is a difference. Which is the point.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 06:57:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series