Display:
No mistyping whatsoever.
I prefer to allow lobby actions around parlamentarians and me be allowed to get along with my life, than have thousands of associations bickering for this or that aspect of a law, or communities asked to vote by referendum every week or so.

Parliamentarian democracy introduces a level of indirection. It is them who bother about it, and are responsible for it. I prefer delegation to direct democracy, I'm not ready or competent to vote on every issue, and I'm not sure we can devise a system of certification of any social organization, their own interests, their own competences and so on.

Bref, the case is far more complicated than just labeling today's democracy as inherently ideological.

Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last! (Martin Luther King)

by ValentinD (walentijn arobase free spot frança) on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 09:09:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That's elective monarchy you're describing, not democracy. At least not democracy in any shape or form that the people who are usually credited with inventing it would recognise.

But hey, what does Jefferson know about democracy anyway :-P

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed Nov 19th, 2008 at 10:24:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series